Subscribe

Sign up to get the Inside Skinny on Epostmarks happenings


Categories
Twitter Feed

Epostmarks Tweets

    Follow Epostmarks on Twitter
    Loading..
    Loading..

    The Modern Wisdom of Epostmarks

    Monday
    16Feb

    Voices: Consumers Prefer Email-Portal Combo for eBilling and eStatement  

    The most common feedback I hear when talking about PostmarkedEmail with both employees and executives at eCommerce divisions of financial institutions is "We currently have a portal solution for eBilling and eStatements. Why do we need you?"

    I almost always reply,"Only 35% of online consumers use portals for online bill pay, and even fewer—between 6% and 16% in 2007—only receive eStatements."

    By now, most financial institutions and billing services offer eStatements and eBilling. But most also fail to effectively convert consumers to electronic services, and reduce costly redundant paper streams. Insufficient consumer convenience and confidence are at the core of slow portal adoption rates and widespread channel redundancies. The result of this market inefficiency is invariably a high cost of time and money for businesses and consumers alike.

    NON-ADOPTER RATIONALE
    Consumers have myriad reasons for inaction, and often blame businesses for drawbacks in their commercial relationship. After all, the customer is always right. Roughly 6% of non-adopters quit using eServices while 23% are undecided (known as “fence-sitters”) and a whopping 71% refuse to use eServices like eBilling and eStatements (known as “holdouts”). Of the “quitters”, the majority stated they could have been convinced to stay and cited shared savings and improved usability
    which we will cover in a later post – as significant reasons for staying. While this is a moderate case for PostmarkedEmail, its value proposition is most noticeable among fence-sitters and holdouts.

    Notably, 34% of fence-sitters and holdouts don't want to fall victim to email fraud (phishing). Email notifications are a critical functionality of portals storing eStatements and eBills - how else would I remember to track my spending and pay my bills on various eCommerce sites I regularly manage? Surprisingly, this figure is much lower than the average Web user, which has broader implications about the negative impact of phishing. According to a 2008 AOTA study, 61% of all Internet users are afraid of phishing. Other estimates have gone as high as 87%.

    ADOPTER CHALLENGES
    Despite eStatement adoption rates of 31–47%, the biggest economic benefit of paper suppression is only realized by a small subset of the business-consumer relationships. Redundant paper streams are prevalent across the gamut with only 6-16% of consumers receiving ONLY eStatements. A recent
    Striata survey provides some insight into the underlying problems. This survey reveals that almost half of consumers prefer to receive their bills and statements as secure email attachments. Over 50% of all consumers indicated that either secure email or a combination of secure email and web portal access would be satisfactory for them to turn off their paper statements altogether.

    The results clearly indicate that secure document delivery via email in conjunction with online access to eStatements and eBills best satisfies current and, more importantly, future consumer preferences.

    Monday
    09Feb

    Voices: Consumers Still Love Email

    Naysayers have long proclaimed that email is on its way out, but market trends and consumer preferences indicate that sentiment is nothing short of contrarian.

    Naturally, amidst the flurry of day-to-day happenings that vie for our attention and appreciation, we often overlook the importance of email in our personal lives. It is no surprise that as a system so vital to our daily functions, email – like its predecessor, Postal Mail – has been taken for granted by many over the years. Still, when asked to stop and reflect on our preferred modes of dealing with businesses, 67% of adult Internet users in North America favored email while 34% and 35% respectively consider websites and Mail an acceptable commercial mode.S

    It is also no surprise that forecasts paint a gloomy picture for physical Mail as opposed to Web-based communication channels. Over the next five years, eMarketer projects that consumer preference of Mail for commercial purposes will plummet 1/3 to 23% popularity. In the face of our financial crisis and earnest desire to modernize our nation's infrastructure, the outlook of physical Mail looks even more grim. On the other hand, new and existing eCommerce channels will continue to rise if not remain relatively constant in the near-term.

    Friday
    30Jan

    How did Maryland and Delaware get Ahead of the Curve?

    Maryland and Delaware have a lot going for them: legendary boating, lovely beaches, great fishing, and close proximity to the East Coast's major metro areas. These two states have also have taken a lead role in developing a promising corner of the Internet.

    As I've mentioned before on this blog, the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) represents a cornerstone of the "e" economy. UETA led to the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (ESIGN) and together these laws have expanded across the entire country to create a foundation for e-business to grow upon. 

    Maryland and Delaware have taken the next step in revising UETA to better serve the evolving eCommerce environment. They have both amended their UETA laws to define electronic messages, protected with an EPM, as the equivalent of U.S. Postal mail. Additionally, these amendments apply to any agreement governed by the laws of those states even if the organizations don't reside there.

    This simple concept--supported unanimously by the legislatures in both states--enables those states to take advantage of existing technology, infrastructure, and policy investments in entirely new ways. The technology, deployed years ago by the USPS, just waits for the right application. The infrastructure of U.S. Postal inspectors, retail outlets and brand awareness stand in the same position. From a policy perspective, this single amendment allows thousands of existing laws and regulations--that all reference mail--to apply. Talk about a highly leveraged move of those legislatures.

    So you ask "What if my state hasn't amended the UETA statute?" Never fear my friends. Most laws and regulations don't require the use of mail exclusively, they just explicitly approve of the mail. The EPM usually fulfills requirements of electronic transactions anyway, it just takes a few extra steps like digging into other parts of the regulation or referencing other laws or precedents. I enjoy explicit approval so much more for ease, clarity, and the peace of mind it provides our customers.

    Here's a list from Section 18 of the US Code where the USPS has jurisdiction to enforce protection of the EPM in any state:

    18 U.S.C. - 1028. Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents and information
    18 U.S.C. - 1029. Fraud and related activity in connection with access devices
    18 U.S.C. - 1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
    18 U.S.C. - 1343. Wire Fraud
    18 U.S.C. - 2701. Unlawful Access to Stored Communications  
    18 U.S.C. - 2510. Definition of "electronic communications"

    Maybe you would expect these policy advances from states known for their nature and leisure...but they seem to have figured out more than just fine living. They've figured how to live fine while keeping an eye on continuing such a lifestyle in the future. Way to go Del Mar.

    Thursday
    29Jan

    EPM goes to Washington

    This week Postmaster General Jack Potter testified before the Senate Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services, and International Security (what a mouthful). Senator Tom Carper chairs the subcommittee and hails from Delaware.

    General Potter had two agenda items of serious import:

    1. He requested the ability to begin 5-day delivery
    2. He requested a restructuring of the USPS requirement to prefund future retiree benefits

    These agenda items received a bulk of the allotted time (transcripts) although one quote from Potter struck me as notable. He predicted that "Revenue growth that is based on business growth...is also a key element that is necessary for our long term viability."

    Apparently Mr. Carper heard the same quote because near the end of the hearing he asked a series of probing questions about potential business growth opportunities including a very intriguing question about the EPM. Listen to this short segment from the hearing:

     

    You see, Delaware has done some trailblazing when it comes to the EPM. As Senator Carper eluded, earlier this year the Delaware legislature unanimously passed an amendment to their UETA statute giving electronic messages protected by an EPM the legal equivalence to physical mail (stay tuned for a post explaining this in more detail).

    The folks from Delaware have identified that this program provides an amazing opportunity to leverage the trust of the USPS outside of the traditional logistics business. I believe that the USPS entered the market incorrectly--twice, but that three is a charm--when they chose single vendors to provision the service. They have finally come up with an industry supported model that promises to overcome the earlier challenges.

    I'm happy to hear the General Potter intends to continue pursuing growth of the EPM program. I believe that it represents an ideal way for the USPS to remain relevant in a world where the communications mix skews heavily electronic. What other opportunities are available to grow revenues with such a low cost basis?

    I think we'll hear more about this. Senator Carper's closing comments indicated that "mostly I want to focus on opportunities that are out there for growth and growing revenues and some that are going well and maybe a couple that we have touched on here today as possibilities."

    The next hearing should take place before March so stay tuned. 

    Postmaster General Potter Senate Testimony

    Friday
    16Jan

    UETA (& ESIGN) in Plain English

    Imagine you wanted to conduct business online in the nineties, not just buy a single item on Amazon, but to set up a brokerage account for example. You would have to sign the application and a bunch of other forms so...you couldn't finish your sign-up online.

    Beginning in 1999, states started to pass the Universal Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) legally granting electronically signed records the same as hand signed ones. Then in 2000 Congress passed ESIGN, the Federal version for interstate commerce, making a national framework that removes barriers to electronic commerce. Now 46 states plus D.C., Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands have passed UETA. Yay!

    What does UETA actually say though? Here's a short list of the most important points:

    • Everyone must consent! Nobody can force you to go electronic.
    • Signatures, contracts, and documents can't be denied simply because they are electronic.
    • You can get an electronic notary if you want one.
    • It's just like you sent the transaction from your place of business.
    • Everything counts even if there is just a computer on the other side.

    Ten years ago this simple law began proliferating across the country and has played a large part in helping the Internet grow into one of the pillars of our current economy.

    Happy 10 Years UETA!!